tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6266974804706141585.post1367337972751573022..comments2023-05-29T02:50:02.536-06:00Comments on Toontown Antics - Roger Rabbit's adventures in real and animated life: Finally! Some news about “Who Framed Roger Rabbit” sequelJ. C. Estradahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05288657557197872068noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6266974804706141585.post-24025990686294297042012-10-17T12:36:50.645-05:002012-10-17T12:36:50.645-05:00Well, I'm not sure about Bonkers. He was Roger...Well, I'm not sure about Bonkers. He was Roger Rabbit's replacement, after all (Bonkers' cartoon was originally planned as a Roger Rabbit cartoon series, but the feud between Disney, Amblin and Gary Wolf -creator of Roger Rabbit and Toontown- took those plans into a different direction. They had to create Bonkers, Miranda and Lucky Piquel out of necessity).J. C. Estradahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05288657557197872068noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6266974804706141585.post-77116445237904197702012-10-17T00:48:08.110-05:002012-10-17T00:48:08.110-05:00On last idea, Bonkers should be in it as well. I t...On last idea, Bonkers should be in it as well. I think he and Roger make a good team.Anthony D.noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6266974804706141585.post-92167155969606202742012-10-17T00:23:48.672-05:002012-10-17T00:23:48.672-05:00Charles Fleischer will be there as Roger Rabbit, I...Charles Fleischer will be there as Roger Rabbit, I can assure that. <br /><br />24 years have passed since WFRR premiere; if the movie sticks to that timeline it would be set at early 70's in the heyday of saturday morning cartoons. And I like that idea ;)J. C. Estradahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05288657557197872068noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6266974804706141585.post-85073224373559944432012-10-16T23:24:33.542-05:002012-10-16T23:24:33.542-05:00Also, they should set the sequel in the 60's-7...Also, they should set the sequel in the 60's-70's.Anthony D.noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6266974804706141585.post-27312667328301408622012-10-16T23:23:07.559-05:002012-10-16T23:23:07.559-05:00To answer your questions; a sequel without Bob Hos...To answer your questions; a sequel without Bob Hoskins could work, they should consider using the Rick Flint character from the comics, and I hope we there yet. The only thing I hope is Charles Fleischer reprises his role as Roger.<br />Anthony D.noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6266974804706141585.post-70887781930777732992012-10-16T13:39:24.132-05:002012-10-16T13:39:24.132-05:00Well, they can go ahead without Bob Hoskins using ...Well, they can go ahead without Bob Hoskins using the same argument that gave us Rick Flint in the comics: Eddie Valiant refuses Roger to be his partner, since he doesn't want to lose another partner again, and he likes Roger enough to get him in danger or killed. <br /><br />And well... There's another possibility, in which Bob Hoskins does a very small cameo as Eddie Valiant or another unrelated background character, just as a nod to the fans of the original movie.<br /><br />I'd like to know a little more about the script, but guess we gotta wait a little more for any details about it.J. C. Estradahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05288657557197872068noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6266974804706141585.post-67770867738758018122012-10-16T06:30:40.780-05:002012-10-16T06:30:40.780-05:00A movie without Hoskins could work if the new movi...A movie without Hoskins could work if the new movie is a prequel (ala "Toon Platoon") set before Roger met Eddie. Or if it takes place in present time(2012 or 2013)since Eddie would most likely have passed away at that point.<br /><br />But since Hoskins was asked to join the project a while back I guess the script for the new film did feature his character. So they must then either rewrite it or have a new actor play him. Hopefully that last option is out of the question. Alex. Ghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08716631126189006033noreply@blogger.com